Property management email list (2026)
By Louis-Marie Giudicenti. Published . Updated . Data read .
A property management email list is a file of property management companies with their business email, phone number and address. Primavera counts 64,922 property management companies on Google Maps in the United States as of November 9, 2026: 28,353 of them (43.7%) come with an email address, 67.4% with a website and 95.3% with a phone number. They are among the worst-rated businesses on Google Maps: 45.7% of rated companies sit under 4 stars, because tenants review them.
- 64,922
- property management companies on Google Maps in the US
- 28,353
- with an email address43.7% of them; 30.1% of all US businesses
- 67.4%
- have a websiteall US businesses: 58.1%
- 95.3%
- list a phone numberall US businesses: 78.5%
Source: Primavera’s database of Google Maps listings, snapshot 2026-11 (counts computed October 29, 2026, read November 9, 2026). Service points such as lockers are left out.
Rows are listings in the Google Maps category “Property management company”. Leasing offices of apartment buildings have their own category and are left out. The Census Bureau counts 60,818 residential and 18,068 nonresidential property managers with paid employees (2023); Google Maps lists 64,922.
Other counts: U.S. Census Bureau, County Business Patterns 2023 (NAICS 531311, Residential Property Managers; NAICS 531312, Nonresidential Property Managers). Read November 4, 2026.
What a row contains, and how often each field is filled for property management companies
Every row has the business name, its Google Maps categories, its address or the area it serves, and the link to its listing. The other fields depend on what each business publishes. You pick the columns of your CSV or Excel file.
| Field | Where it comes from | Filled for property management companies |
|---|---|---|
| Phone | The Google Maps listing. | 95.3% |
| Website | The listing. | 67.4% |
| The business’s own website, or open data such as Overture Maps. | 43.7% | |
| Rating, number of reviews | The listing. | 63.2% have a review |
| Chain | Our matching of names and websites. | 0.8% belong to one |
| Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn links | Links found on the website. | 44.8%, 28.7%, 22.6% of the websites read |
| Website builder | Read on the website (WordPress, Wix…). | 50.1% of the websites read |
| Ad tags | Read on the website (Meta, Google Ads…). | 13.1% of the websites read |
Source: Primavera, snapshot 2026-11. Website fields: the 36,784 sites Primavera read, 84.1% of the 43,761 listings with a website link.
California has the most property management companies, North Dakota the most per resident
Property management companies per 10,000 residents, by state
64,922 property management companies on Google Maps, November 9, 2026.
- 0.8–1.3
- 1.4–1.5
- 1.6–1.7
- 1.8–2.2
- 2.3–4.8
| # | State | Listings | Per 10,000 residents | With an email | vs national (pts) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | California | 7,640 | 1.9 | 46.9% | +3.2 pts |
| 2 | Florida | 6,389 | 2.7 | 46.2% | +2.5 pts |
| 3 | Texas | 4,101 | 1.3 | 48.2% | +4.5 pts |
| 4 | New York | 3,539 | 1.8 | 37.7% | −6.0 pts |
| 5 | Georgia | 1,950 | 1.7 | 39.5% | −4.2 pts |
| 6 | North Carolina | 1,863 | 1.7 | 45.8% | +2.1 pts |
| 7 | Illinois | 1,822 | 1.4 | 42.6% | −1.1 pts |
| 8 | Colorado | 1,818 | 3.1 | 41.6% | −2.1 pts |
| 9 | Pennsylvania | 1,590 | 1.2 | 44.4% | +0.7 pts |
| 10 | Michigan | 1,512 | 1.5 | 40.5% | −3.2 pts |
| 11 | Virginia | 1,503 | 1.7 | 49.4% | +5.7 pts |
| 12 | Ohio | 1,453 | 1.2 | 40.7% | −3.0 pts |
| 13 | New Jersey | 1,436 | 1.5 | 38.0% | −5.7 pts |
| 14 | Massachusetts | 1,333 | 1.9 | 45.4% | +1.7 pts |
| 15 | Maryland | 1,283 | 2.0 | 43.9% | +0.2 pts |
| 16 | Washington | 1,279 | 1.6 | 49.6% | +5.9 pts |
| 17 | Arizona | 1,132 | 1.5 | 43.1% | −0.6 pts |
| 18 | South Carolina | 1,110 | 2.0 | 47.0% | +3.3 pts |
| 19 | Tennessee | 1,062 | 1.5 | 42.6% | −1.1 pts |
| 20 | Missouri | 1,031 | 1.7 | 41.7% | −2.0 pts |
| 21 | Indiana | 1,022 | 1.5 | 41.2% | −2.5 pts |
| 22 | Oregon | 1,017 | 2.4 | 51.0% | +7.3 pts |
| 23 | Minnesota | 981 | 1.7 | 36.8% | −6.9 pts |
| 24 | Wisconsin | 956 | 1.6 | 43.5% | −0.2 pts |
| 25 | Utah | 761 | 2.2 | 43.0% | −0.7 pts |
| 26 | Idaho | 707 | 3.5 | 49.5% | +5.8 pts |
| 27 | Alabama | 623 | 1.2 | 37.9% | −5.8 pts |
| 28 | Connecticut | 587 | 1.6 | 39.2% | −4.5 pts |
| 29 | Nevada | 559 | 1.7 | 46.3% | +2.6 pts |
| 30 | Oklahoma | 547 | 1.3 | 40.0% | −3.7 pts |
| 31 | Louisiana | 525 | 1.1 | 41.9% | −1.8 pts |
| 32 | Kentucky | 508 | 1.1 | 41.1% | −2.6 pts |
| 33 | Kansas | 505 | 1.7 | 41.6% | −2.1 pts |
| 34 | Montana | 455 | 4.0 | 54.5% | +10.8 pts |
| 35 | Iowa | 425 | 1.3 | 45.4% | +1.7 pts |
| 36 | North Dakota | 385 | 4.8 | 29.1% | −14.6 pts |
| 37 | Arkansas | 363 | 1.2 | 39.4% | −4.3 pts |
| 38 | Maine | 344 | 2.4 | 49.1% | +5.4 pts |
| 39 | Mississippi | 288 | 1.0 | — | — |
| 40 | New Mexico | 287 | 1.3 | — | — |
| 41 | New Hampshire | 264 | 1.9 | — | — |
| 42 | District of Columbia | 231 | 3.3 | — | — |
| 43 | Nebraska | 229 | 1.1 | — | — |
| 44 | South Dakota | 215 | 2.3 | — | — |
| 45 | Vermont | 207 | 3.2 | — | — |
| 46 | Hawaii | 205 | 1.4 | — | — |
| 47 | Delaware | 196 | 1.9 | — | — |
| 48 | Rhode Island | 169 | 1.5 | — | — |
| 49 | West Virginia | 149 | 0.8 | — | — |
| 50 | Wyoming | 131 | 2.2 | — | — |
| 51 | Alaska | 99 | 1.3 | — | — |
All US property management companies: 43.7% with an email
California has 7,640 property management companies; North Dakota has 4.8 per 10,000 residents. The share with an email runs from 29.1% in North Dakota to 54.5% in Montana, among the 38 states with 300 listings or more. 6,136 listings (9.5%) serve an area with no public address: they count in the national total, in no state.
Source: Primavera, November 9, 2026. Residents: U.S. Census Bureau, 2024 estimates. A share with an email is shown for states with 300 listings or more.
Property management companies: WordPress on 36.0% of websites, against 29.2% for all businesses
| On the website | Property management companies | All US businesses | Rank of trades |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meta pixel or Facebook plugin | 8.2% | 8.8% | 20 of 36 |
| Google Ads tag | 7.2% | 6.1% | 12 of 36 |
| Google Analytics or Tag Manager | 52.5% | 38.5% | 7 of 36 |
| Any ad tag | 13.1% | 13.1% | 19 of 36 |
| WordPress | 36.0% | 29.2% | 13 of 36 |
| Wix | 8.3% | 7.1% | 15 of 36 |
| Squarespace | 6.0% | 5.6% | 15 of 36 |
| Any recognized builder | 50.1% | 43.7% | 17 of 36 |
Against the average US business, the Google Ads tag is slightly more common on the websites of property management companies (12th of 36), and the Meta tag slightly less common (20th of 36).
Google Analytics or Tag Manager sits on 52.5% of their websites, against 38.5% for all businesses: they measure their traffic more than they advertise.
Note: Shares of the 36,784 websites Primavera read. The Meta tag also loads Facebook’s buttons and chat, so its share is an upper bound. GoDaddy, Weebly and Duda sites count as no recognized builder.
Rated 3.79 stars on average, 45.7% under 4
| On Google Maps | Property management companies | All US businesses |
|---|---|---|
| Average Google rating | 3.79 | 4.44 |
| Median number of reviews | 9 | 11 |
| Rated under 4 stars | 45.7% | 17.4% |
| No review at all | 36.8% | 42.2% |
Property management companies rank 35th of the 36 trades we measure by average rating; 45.7% of those rated sit under 4 stars, against 17.4% of all rated US businesses.
The average rating is 3.79 stars, against 4.44 for all businesses: a list for anyone selling reputation management.
0.8% belong to a chain or network
The trade is local: the largest network, FirstService Residential, has 94 listings.
| Network | Listings | Share of the trade |
|---|---|---|
| FirstService Residential | 94 | 0.1% |
| RealManage | 45 | 0.1% |
| PMI | 42 | 0.1% |
Across all US businesses, the share is 7.9%. The search’s “Hide chains” setting leaves them out.
The whole list: $119 on Agency, about $383 in Pro credits
| Source | Price | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Primavera Agency | $119 a month (€99 excl. VAT) | All 64,922 property management companies, or the 28,353 with an email, in one month: exports are unlimited under fair use, up to 2,000,000 US businesses in any 30 days. |
| Primavera Pro | about $383 for all 64,922; about $167 for the 28,353 with an email | 1 credit per business exported; $59 a month (€49 excl. VAT) for 10,000 credits, top-ups at the same rate. |
Checking the addresses costs 1 credit per address, on either plan. Both plans export from the web app, the API, or Claude through our MCP server. Generalist brokers price by the record: Exact Data publishes $0.30 per business contact, email “if available”. How fair use works.
Prices: Primavera’s price grid; list vendors’ pages read November 4, 2026, linked in the table. Vendors count records their own way, often people.
Property management companies next to related trades
| Trade | Listings | With an email | Google Ads tag | Average rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Property management companies | 64,922 | 43.7% | 7.2% | 3.79 |
| Real estate agents | 689,488 | 44.3% | 7.2% | 4.73 |
| Interior designers | 47,951 | 52.3% | 4.1% | 4.78 |
| Roofing contractors | 122,016 | 43.5% | 11.4% | 4.62 |
Source: Primavera, November 9, 2026. Google Ads tag: share of the websites read.
What these figures don’t say
- Apartment leasing offices. They have their own category and are not here.
- Homeowner associations. Many are managed by these companies but are not listed apart.
- Who writes the reviews. Tenants, owners and board members rate the same listing.
- People’s contacts. The email is the one the business publishes.
- Whether an address delivers. Checks run on request, once the list exists.
Questions
Why are property managers rated so low?
Because tenants review them, often after a dispute. 45.7% of rated companies sit under 4 stars, against 17.4% of all businesses.
Does the list include apartment leasing offices?
No. “Apartment rental agency” is a separate Google Maps category, closer to a building than to a manager.
How much does a property management email list cost?
The 28,353 companies with an email cost 28,353 credits, about $167 on Pro, or one month of Agency.
Method and data
Snapshot 2026-11, read November 9, 2026- What is counted
- The Google Maps category “Property management company”. Leasing offices of apartment buildings (“Apartment rental agency”) are left out. 64,922 listings, counted on October 29, 2026 and read on November 9, 2026.
- Google Maps categories
- One category: Property management company.
- Website signals
- Read on the 36,784 own websites Primavera could open; links to social networks or booking platforms are not read.
- Updates
- Websites are read again every day; the figures on this page are refreshed every month. Sources and definitions: how Primavera’s data is built.
- Cite this page
- Louis-Marie Giudicenti (2026). “Property management email list (2026).” Primavera. Data: snapshot 2026-11, November 9, 2026. https://primaverapp.com/en/email-lists/property-management
Written by Louis-Marie Giudicenti
Founder of Primavera. Primavera sells lists of local businesses built from the same database.
Published
Updated
Open the search
The property management companies search from this page, ready to open in Primavera:
- Target
- Property management
- Location
- United States
- Contact info
- Has email
Free, no account needed. Contact details stay hidden until you create a list. 300 free credits when you sign up.
